<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil Service Compensation Scheme &#8211; Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts and photos of my journey through life…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 06:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/comment-page-1/#comment-9257</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/?p=4516#comment-9257</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that, as you say interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that, as you say interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/comment-page-1/#comment-9256</link>
		<dc:creator>K Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 20:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/?p=4516#comment-9256</guid>
		<description>I am LPC graduate with law degree with several years of litigation experience - although I am not employment law professional, I have my views which your readers may find interesting.  I have been following the CSCS scheme developments and PCS challenge and find it very interesting.  I would like to share my views of a case law that is some way similar to situation that PCS and civil servants find themselves caught up in. The case is Stratis Andreadis v. Greece -  the Greece Government enacted a new law in 1987 , which had the effect of rendering the arbitration award in favour of  Stratis void and unenforceable. Stratis  complained to the Strasbourg, inter alia, under Article 1. Protocol No1 to the convention. 
Challenge brought by PCS it was established that Civil Servants had accrued rights. This is established under the superannuation Act 1972.  These accrued rights in some way are no different to salary paid at end of the month - the employer hold on to the salary until end of month ( therefore salary is accrued right).  The CSCS accrued rights were based on length of service.  This is not some promise in future  it is an accrued right  established from length of service rendered.
In case of Stan Andreadis v. Greece – it is interesting to note that property right fell within the scope of Article 1 of Protocol No 1. at the time when the annulling law was passed in a 1987.  ( in Civil Servants case its been established that Compensation earned upto date under the current CSCS is property).  Another words the new law enacted in 1987 came after the property right had been established.

Very Interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am LPC graduate with law degree with several years of litigation experience &#8211; although I am not employment law professional, I have my views which your readers may find interesting.  I have been following the CSCS scheme developments and PCS challenge and find it very interesting.  I would like to share my views of a case law that is some way similar to situation that PCS and civil servants find themselves caught up in. The case is Stratis Andreadis v. Greece &#8211;  the Greece Government enacted a new law in 1987 , which had the effect of rendering the arbitration award in favour of  Stratis void and unenforceable. Stratis  complained to the Strasbourg, inter alia, under Article 1. Protocol No1 to the convention.<br />
Challenge brought by PCS it was established that Civil Servants had accrued rights. This is established under the superannuation Act 1972.  These accrued rights in some way are no different to salary paid at end of the month &#8211; the employer hold on to the salary until end of month ( therefore salary is accrued right).  The CSCS accrued rights were based on length of service.  This is not some promise in future  it is an accrued right  established from length of service rendered.<br />
In case of Stan Andreadis v. Greece – it is interesting to note that property right fell within the scope of Article 1 of Protocol No 1. at the time when the annulling law was passed in a 1987.  ( in Civil Servants case its been established that Compensation earned upto date under the current CSCS is property).  Another words the new law enacted in 1987 came after the property right had been established.</p>
<p>Very Interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/comment-page-1/#comment-9050</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/?p=4516#comment-9050</guid>
		<description>The members of at least one of those unions aren&#039;t happy.  The worst bit about it is they did it sneakily, I wonder what their motive was...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The members of at least one of those unions aren&#8217;t happy.  The worst bit about it is they did it sneakily, I wonder what their motive was&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CherryPie</title>
		<link>http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/comment-page-1/#comment-9049</link>
		<dc:creator>CherryPie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/?p=4516#comment-9049</guid>
		<description>B****y annoying isn&#039;t it.  Some of my colleagues are in one of those unions and they are well hacked off, they feel they have been sold out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B****y annoying isn&#8217;t it.  Some of my colleagues are in one of those unions and they are well hacked off, they feel they have been sold out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jams o donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/comment-page-1/#comment-9046</link>
		<dc:creator>jams o donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/?p=4516#comment-9046</guid>
		<description>Ach the smaller unions are showing their spinelessness. this is the behaviour I would expect from the Impotent Scabs Union, aka the Immigration Service Union</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ach the smaller unions are showing their spinelessness. this is the behaviour I would expect from the Impotent Scabs Union, aka the Immigration Service Union</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrissy</title>
		<link>http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/index.php/2010/10/12/civil-service-compensation-scheme-update/comment-page-1/#comment-9044</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrissy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 19:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cheriesplace.me.uk/blog/?p=4516#comment-9044</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, &quot;no comment&quot; as she spits out feathers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, &#8220;no comment&#8221; as she spits out feathers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
